INTEGRATIVE STATISTICS
  • Home
  • Services
    • Expert Witness Services
    • Refine Your Question
    • Locate a Technique
  • Past Projects
    • Education
    • Health Care
    • Business
    • Archaeology
  • About
    • Testimonials
    • Contact
  • Blog

Blog

Gun Control:  the Right Research Evidence Makes Policy Decisions Easy

3/12/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Suppose a nationally-scaled, 30-year, multiple-author, peer-reviewed, non-partisan, public-health-oriented study concluded the following: "Where guns are more widely available, no more of the burglars and intruders are getting shot, but more of the gun-owners' family and friends are."

This is the central finding of The Relationship Between Gun Ownership and Stranger and Nonstranger Firearm Homicide Rates in the United States, 1981–2010. The authors explain, "Our models consistently failed to uncover a robust, statistically significant relationship between gun ownership and stranger firearm homicide rates (Tables 3 and 4). All models, however, showed a positive and significant association between gun ownership and nonstranger firearm homicide rates."

​They add: "for each 1 percentage point increase in the gun ownership proxy, [stranger firearm homicide rates stayed the same, whereas] nonstranger firearm homicide rates increased by 1.4%. [Similarly,] a 1 standard deviation increase in gun ownership [13.8%] was associated with a 21.1% increase in the nonstranger firearm homicide rate."

The research is very sound.
​
  • Siegel, Negussie, Vanture, Pleskunas, Ross, and King paid close attention to the validity of the indicators they used, and they made intelligent use of a proxy when a direct measurement was not available. For their main predictor, "the annual prevalence of household firearm ownership in a given state," they substituted the percentage of suicides committed using a firearm, and they clearly explained why this would be effective.
 
  • The authors took great care to isolate the relationship of greatest interest by controlling for nuisance variables.
 
  • They conducted sensitivity analysis: where a judgment call might result in the choice of one analytic approach or another, they analyzed their data in multiple ways to see how much the results changed. One example of this was their treatment of missing data.

​Can you refute their findings?

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Roland B. Stark

    Note:  posts from before 2022 have been imported from yellowbrickstats.com and thus will initially appear here without "likes" or comments.

    Archives

    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    May 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    June 2018
    March 2018
    September 2017
    November 2015

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Services
    • Expert Witness Services
    • Refine Your Question
    • Locate a Technique
  • Past Projects
    • Education
    • Health Care
    • Business
    • Archaeology
  • About
    • Testimonials
    • Contact
  • Blog